Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Medicine has always been personalized. For years, physicians have incorporated environmental, behavioural, and genetic factors that affect disease and drug response into patient management decisions. However, until recently, the 'genetic' data took the form of family history and self-reported race/ethnicity. As genome sequencing declines in cost, the availability of specific genomic information will no longer be limiting. Rather, our ability to parse these data and our decision whether to use it will become primary. As our understanding of genetic association with drug responses and diseases continues to improve, clinically useful genetic tests may emerge to improve upon our previous methods of assessing genetic risks. Indeed, genetic tests for monogenic disorders have already proven useful. Such changes may usher in a new era of personalized medicine. In this review, we will discuss the utility and limitations of personal genomic data in three domains: pharmacogenomics, assessment of genetic predispositions for common diseases, and identification of rare disease-causing genetic variants.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/eurheartj/ehs112

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur Heart J

Publication Date

07/2012

Volume

33

Pages

1564 - 1570

Keywords

Anticoagulants, Cardiovascular Diseases, Clopidogrel, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Pharmacogenetics, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Precision Medicine, Risk Adjustment, Ticlopidine, Warfarin